III. Firearm Information by Type
C. Semi-Automatic Pistols
2. Models and Manufacturers
b. Beretta
6. Military Use of the Beretta 92F
by Combat Arms
Combat Arms
2869 Grove Way
Castro Valley, California 94546-6709
Telephone (415) 538-6544
Updates on Beretta 92F Pistols
The information that follows is based upon the information
contained in the Beretta U.S.A. publication and conversations with
Beretta staff. It is hoped that this material will assist the
reader in evaluating the Beretta 92F. Please place this material
on other BBS systems so that others may have their questions
answered from this material. Should you have additional questions,
please telephone Combat Arms at the above number between 10 a.m.
and 6 p.m., Tuesday through Sunday (closed on Mondays).
In 1985, after exhaustive and rigorous testing, the Beretta
92F 9mm pistol was selected to become the new standard U.S.
military sidearm and to replace the venerable Colt .45 M1911A1.
Since the contract award Beretta U.S.A. has continually
demonstrated an extraordinary level of performance in meeting the
contract terms. The facts speak for themselves and are a matter of
public record:
- Over 100,000 92F pistols (designated as the M9 pistol by
the military) have been delivered to date against a total
contract award of 320,000 units.
-
Beretta U.S.A is currently shipping about 6,000 92F
pistols per month to the U.S. forces from their Accokeek,
Maryland plant.
-
Beretta 92F pistols are meeting or exceeding U.S. military
requirements in day-to-day production testing. Reliability
testing shows an average of one malfunction every 30,000
rounds, and service life to be double the 5,000 round Army
requirement.
-
The 92F is proving itself in the field as well. Although
shooting qualification testing has been made tougher,
scores in the military are up.
-
Maintainability is excellent. Confidence levels by
military personnel carrying the 92F are high.
The U.S. military selection is based on performance against
clearly defined specifications where Beretta's 92F met and soundly
defeated eight (8) competitors. This was not by chance. Rather than
criticize Beretta's success, perhaps other gun manufacturers would
do well to learn by it
Beretta won the 9mm contract fairly because it could meet the
tests of performance and price. The 92F is now the standard of
comparison among 9mm combat sidearms. I believe that Beretta
intends to keep it that way.
The Second Competition
"The only reason the Army is doing this second competition is
because it was ordered to do so," said an official Army spokesman.
This statement sums up the competition that was initiated by the
Army in October, 1987, to purchase an additional 142,000 pistols.
Here are some facts concerning the follow-on test:
- The Beretta contract is not affected at all by the new
competition.
-
The follow-on competition is a direct result of political
efforts on behalf of Smith & Wesson by their congressional
representatives to give them another opportunity to win
what they were unable to do in the 1984 U.S. Army test won
by Beretta.
-
Allow the follow-on competition was initiated on their
behalf, Smith & Wesson has declined to even submit their
9mm pistol for consideration and testing by the military
for the follow-on 9mm pistol contract. The public will not
have the chance to evaluate their performance again.
-
Performance specifications are the same as those issued
in the original 1984 competition won by Beretta.
-
Since the Beretta M9 is being tested against these same
standards on a day-to-day basis and it is exceeding
requirements, Beretta was not required to enter the new
competition and will let their 1984 test results stand for
the follow-on contract competition.
Additional Testing Since The Contract Was Awarded To Beretta
Twelve standard production M9 9mm pistols recently completed
exhaustive endurance and reliability tests conducted jointly by
the U.S. Army and Beretta U.S.A.
Each of the high performance 9mm pistols was tested through
20,000 rounds of actual firing without difficulty. This exceptional
reliability and performance exceeds military expectations by 400
percent, and is indicative of the superior quality of M9 pistols
and other Beretta products.
Following the test and Beretta's exceptional performance, the
Army affirmed the integrity of the M9's design by saying it was
in conformance with the technical data package and contractual
specifications set forth.
Beretta has delivered over 125,000 M9 pistols to the U.S.
Armed Forces as of June, 1988. M9 pistols are being deployed
throughout the five armed services and are becoming a standard part
of the scenery on U.S. military installations worldwide.
Law Enforcement Use Of The Beretta 92F
The overwhelming success of the Beretta 92F 9mm handgun is
evidenced by the growing number of law enforcement agencies
adopting the gun as the new standard sidearm. In the last two
months, for example, five agencies have signed contracts with
Beretta U.S.A. for 92F's, while many more have requested bid
proposals in anticipation of trading their outdated revolvers for
the sophisticated 9mm.
In early June, 1988, Police Chief Col. Andrew Demers led the
Maine State Police to this new era in law enforcement life by
choosing the Beretta 92F as the official sidearm of his troopers,
after extensive testing and evaluation.
"The initial order will exceed 400 pistols," said Deputy Chief
Operations Officer Lt. Col. Daniel L. Cote of the Maine State
Police, in an interview June 20, 1988.
Delivery of pistols for the Maine State Police began in June,
1988.
Maryland's Anne Arundel County Police Department is another
in the continuing flow of law enforcement agencies to contract for
92's in recent weeks. On April 19, 1988, the Department held a
press conference and very effective firing demonstration at its
range in Davidsonville, MD and announced the intention to buy 500
Beretta 92F 9mm pistols.
M9 Pistol Slide Update
(May 10, 1988)
The following is a memo from Beretta to its dealers on the
slide breakage that was reported.
"As part of our effort to keep you advised on the most current
developments as associated with the M9 slide breakage, we have
prepared this second update notice. Facts contained in this update
should help set the record straight and correct inaccurate and
outdated information that is being circulated, in some cases, as
part of a misinformation campaign against the Beretta made U.S.
military M9 and 92F semiautomatic pistol.
-
No problem exists with the military M9 pistol. U.S.
Government engineers and technicians have extensively
examined the metallurgy, dimensions and manufacturing of
the M9 pistol and can find nothing which indicates that
the cause of breakage lies with the weapon. U.S.
Government examiners have commented on the remarkable
quality of the product.
-
The two unexpected slide breakage incidents occurred with
non-NATO certified ammunition during non-standard,
continuous endurance firing. Field use of the weapon was
limited to 3,000 rounds each while a study of the cause
of the breakage was being conducted.
-
The focus of the study is now shifting to the ammunition
which broke the February slide. Preliminary analysis by
Beretta indicates that the ammunition may produce
pressures exceeding 50,000 psi, or almost double the
pressure of a standard cartridge.
-
That the breakages were caused by excessively hot
ammunition is corroborated by the fact that no one has
been able to duplicate the type of breakage with any type
of ammunition other than the uncertified type involved
in the February, 1988 incident. Over 150 M( designed
pistols have been endurance tested under the direct
supervision of the U.S. Government or by various foreign
governments to 5,000 rounds and beyond (several tests
going beyond 10,000 rounds) using non-problem types of
ammunition. Not a single breakage, crack or even
microscopic indication of breakage has occurred.
-
Since the ammunition involved can only be purchased by
the U.S. military, no general warning notice to industry
about the ammunition is being issued by Beretta at this
time.
-
One million slides of this type have been manufactured
to date. No other reports of breakage of this type have
ever occurred in the history of the weapon. Law
enforcement and military confidence in the weapon remains
high.
Memorandum On Article In American Handgunner Magazine
(July 13, 1988)
This memorandum is to advise you of a recent article in the
September/October, 1988 issue of American Handgunner that contains
outdated and erroneous information concerning the M9 pistol and
to supply you with information to use in the event the article is
brought to your attention by your customers.
As you know, magazines work several months in advance of
publication. We have reason to believe this article was written in
early May (1988), accounting for the outdated information contained
in it. Here are the latest facts concerning the M9:
- The U.S. Army has completed a thorough examination of M9
pistols for endurance and reliability, whereby twelve
standard production M9's were tested through 20,000
rounds of actual firing without difficulty. This exceeded
military expectations by 400 percent and led to our
receipt of a positive letter from the Army last week,
stating that the M9 meets the requirements of its
contract, including a stipulation that M9 slides have a
7,000 round service life.
- A subsequent investigation was completed on all model 92
series pistols in the U.S. Customs inventories. No U.S.
Customs pistol showed any sign of slide cracks; moreover,
one pistol was estimated to have been fired up to 10,000
rounds. We anticipate a U.S. Customs circulated
communique on this shortly.
- The American Handgunner article reports that different
types of ammunition were used in two breakage incidents.
Since the time of our last communication on this subject
(May 10, 1988), we have been advised that both breakage
incidents occurred with a suspect lot of M882 ammunition.
More specifically, the initial breakage of the Navy slide
did not occur with Olin/Winchester 147 grain subsonic
ammunition, and it may have occurred at up to 6,000
rounds of usage.
- The American Handgunner article interviewed Olin to
verify the quality of their M882 ammunition and applied
this information to Beretta's situation and statements.
In fact, Olin is not the manufacturer of the M882
ammunition which is purported to have broken M9 slides.
- The American Handgunner article's reportage of the slide
issue may lead readers to believe the government opened
a new test for a standard Armed Forces sidearm based on
the two isolated slide failure incidents. This is false.
On October 15, 1986, the House/Senate Appropriations
Conference Committee agreed on a compromise of the 9mm
pistol procurement program that effectively reasserted
the original contract award to Beretta U.S.A. (320,000
pistols worth about $76,000,000) while mandating a
re-competition on future orders at an additional
estimated cost of $15,000,000 to taxpayers. The initial
re-competition testing was cancelled by the Army as a
result of renewed political pressure exerted by a
competitor.
- The American Handgunner article is based on a Navy
communique dated nearly six months ago, in early 1988.
Since that time, many issues in the communique are either
outdated or dead, making it entirely unfair and
misleading to treat these issues as fresh.
- 7. By late May, Beretta resumed deliveries of M9 pistols to
the U.S. Armed Forces, and by June, 1988 had delivered
over 125,000 M9's.