III. Firearm Information by Type

C. Semi-Automatic Pistols

2. Models and Manufacturers

r. Smith & Wesson

4. Model 41
by Christian J. van den Branden Lambrecht (vdb@ltssg3.epfl.ch)

After having fired my instructor's Haemmerli for a few months, I decided to buy a precision .22LR pistol and I looked at a few company. I definitely wanted a very good gun since I was used to the quality of Haemmerli. Having discussed with several shooters and guns sellers, my choice narrowed to the Beretta 89, the Haemmerli 215/280 and the Smith and Wesson 41. I discarded the Beretta since several people told me that it was not as good as the other ones. Finally, I went for the S&W 41, recommended by my gun dealer. The 41 is the best .22LR made by S&W. Frankly, if you want to do some serious practice, don't even take a look at the other S&W .22LR (422, 622, 2206,...). These guns are good if you just want to do some occasional practise or if you are not sure you want to invest in a gun. If you want to do some serious shooting, they will not be good enough (too light, bad trigger, not precise).

The 41, on the contrary, is, in my opinion, a very good gun for smallbore competition. It has all the quality required: a very smooth trigger, great balance, very good weight (48 oz.). It comes in 5" or 7" barrel, blue finish, wooden grip, and, of course, adjustable sights. Compared to an Haemmerli, I think it is very close in quality and I strongly recommend this gun. About price, I don't know how much it can cost in the US (S&W told me 750$). In Switzerland it cost 1300Frs.


2. Model 41 - Further Information
by Emmanuel Baechler (baechler@lia.di.epfl.ch)

The S&W 41 has been designed during the fifties as a NRA's bullseye gun, when the current ISU rimfire discipline did not exist. At that time, its strongest competitors was the High Standard (and the Walther Olympia on the European market).

Compared to European ISU rimfire competition models, the S&W 41 has the following characteristics:

How to evaluate the overall interest of this gun?

I'll let people used to NRA's bullseye and metallic silhouette evaluate it for these disciplines. I'll limit myself to informal target shooting and to ISU rimfire.

The S&W 41 has clearly the potential to compete with European competition guns in ISU rimfire matches. Its accuracy is comparable, or even better than the one of any other gun involved in this discipline. It has an excellent trigger and excellent sights. Its drawback is that it cannot be adjusted as extensively as its competitors. It does also not come with a fully orthopedic grip. It is thus not as efficient for high level competitions as its adversaries. For local or regional matches it is however dubious that its simpler "user interface" do really limit the performances of target shooters.

For initiation to formal target shooting is id definitely good enough and by a serious margin. Its simplicity is, IMO, an advantage: the shooter can concentrate on basic shooting skills, without worrying about things like adjustment of the trigger's weight and course. The absence of these adjustments does also mean that the beginner won't be able to "jerk" them.

If the S&W 41 is a good gun for regional ISU competitions, there's no reason why it should not be a good gun for informal target shooting. In addition of all its shooting qualities, it will give its owner the satisfaction to have a very nice and well made gun.

People should however be warned that this gun has been tuned to work with standard velocity ammo. It's a precision tool, and extensive use of high speed ammo will at least shorten its lifetime and maybe damage it.