V. Defensive Use of Firearms
B. Reviews of Literature and Other Relevant Information
6. Physio-Psychological Effects of Violent Encounters
by Patrick Casey (pcasey@interart.com)
Physio-Psychological Aspects of Violent Encounters, Massad Ayoob, 120 minutes, LFI, $59.95
From the jacket: As fight or flight reflex kicks in during a deadly danger
situation, the combatant experiences numerous body alarm reactions and
altered perspectives. This tape explains all of them, from their
far-reaching dynamics, to how to cope with them -- both at the time, and in
short- and long-term aftermath.
This is a videotape of one of Ayoob's LFI lectures. He begins by stating
that if you understand the physio-psychological aspects of violent
encounters -- if you know what's happening to you -- you are less apt to
fear them. He also points out that if you are involved in a violent
incident, your perception of it may differ from what others see -- or
what's on the videotape from the store's security camera. Understanding
these altered perceptions can be a key to subsequent (courtroom)
credibility.
All these effects are expressions of body alarm reaction -- increased
pulse, blood pressure, and respiration, plus the instant supercharge of
adrenaline dump. Body alarm reaction finds its highest expression in the
"fight or flight reflex." The latter was first quantified and
systematically studied around the turn of the century by Dr. Walter Cannon
(Harvard). Fight or flight reflex manifests in effects such as a period of
superhuman strength (followed by a precipitous drop), imperviousness to
pain, increased speed, gross decrease in fine motor skills, and trembling
in the extremities. Ayoob advises his students to remember this: strength
goes way up; dexterity goes way down.
What follows is a list of common physio-psychological effects that arise
during life-or-death situations. Ayoob says that it's rare for them all to
appear, but that it's equally rare for none of them to.
- Tachypsychia (literally: the speed of the mind) -- the
distortion of perceived time. In a life-or-death situation, the mind kicks
into overdrive, perceiving orders of magnitude more information than is
customary. This causes the perception that things are happening in slow
motion, even though you -- and your opponent -- are probably moving faster
than you ever have. Tachypsychia can also work in reverse ("it all happened
so fast"). Ayoob's experiences lead him to observe that the more
experienced and highly trained a person is, the more likely that person is
to experience tachypsychia. That is, a person who knows that "trouble
happens" is less likely to be surprised by it, and more likely to respond
with super-heightened awareness. A concrete upshot of tachypsychia is that
one should not speak with responding officers on the question of how long
an encounter took. Rather, say "officer, he was trying to kill me, and I
didn't have time to check my watch."
- Tunnel Vision -- the mind focuses on the deadly threat to the
exclusion of much of one's ordinary peripheral vision. It appears as if one
is looking at the threat through a tube (or tunnel, precisely), and it
requires conscious effort to see more than a few degrees to the right or
left, or up or down. This can be a problem if you're dealing with multiple
opponents.
- Auditory Exclusion -- could also be called "tunnel hearing."
Like tunnel vision, auditory exclusion is largely a function of the brain's
cortex. That is, the brain has kicked into fight or flight reflex, focusing
on the threat and screening out everything extraneous to immediate
survival. One is still -- physically -- seeing and hearing as usual, but
the brain is screening lots of things out. Tunnel vision and auditory
exclus
appears larger, therefore closer, often by as much as a 3-to-1 ratio. A man
with a knife five yards away appears to be five feet away; .22s look like
.44 magnums. You may not hear the officer behind you yelling "don't shoot;"
you may not even hear your own shots (rest assured however that 'clickers'
will the the loudest sounds you've ever heard). If you experience such
physio-psychological aspects in a violent encounter -- and don't recognize
them for what they are -- and recount your (distorted) perceptions to
police, you can be in world of trouble when your case goes to court.
- Precognition -- commonly called a "sixth sense" (a good phrase
to avoid). Precognition has to do with having seen something so many times
that you "see it coming" before the unthreatened observer -- such as a
witness -- does. The connection with fight or flight reflex is that, in a
deadly threat situation, the mind draws on memory resources that are not
typically used. Precognition is a response to a subconsciously perceived
queue, and has successfully been used in criminal defense (Miami policeman
Luis Alvarez, 1982).
- Denial Response -- On an otherwise normal day, you get a call
out of the blue telling you that your mother has died. Your first response?
"No! Mother can't be dead!" Another common example is people yelling "no"
at a car that's about to hit them, or hit someone else. Again citing
Officer Alvarez, within 30 seconds he went from thinking it was about time
for a coffee break, to having blown a person's brains out. His first radio
transmission was "my gun went off," not "someone tried to kill me, and I
shot him." The implications for the armed citizen are obvious...
- Amaurosis Fugax (temporary blindness) -- while "visual white
out" is relatively rare, what is commonly called "hysterical blindness" is
less so. The eyes have seen something so terrifying, the brain refuses to
see it anymore. Ayoob observes that this is more likely to happen to the
untrained, to those unprepared to deal with potential violence. One
concrete upshot of this is that amaurosis fugax often translates into
fleeing the scene of the shooting. In almost every court, flight equals
guilt. The legal theory is that the person who did right will stand his or
her ground to explain as need be; the person who flees does so because
there is culpability involved. Again, the implications for the armed
citizen are obvious...
- Psychological Splitting -- the more highly trained a person is,
the apt more he or she is to experience this (happened to Ayoob in 1971).
When you have trained something to the point that you can do it on
autopilot -- coupled with something that triggers fight or flight -- the
body moves so fast that the conscious mind can't keep up. This can result
in the perception of watching oneself do something. Ayoob counsels that if
one experiences this, one is well served not to mention it in the initial
debrief to local law enforcement; they may think you're crazy.
- Excorporation -- out of body experience, the highest
manifestation of psychological splitting. This is most commonly seen on
operating tables after clinical death, and is often combined with a white
tunnel of light (see items 2 and 6 above). It is also seen in gunfights
with persons who think they are about to die. Its cause is that survival
instinct is taking all the senses into overdrive, into hyper-perception one
might say. In this state, the mind can generate 3-D images from sounds and
recollected sights. Even when the body is unconscious, the ears still hear
and -- if they are open -- the eyes can still see. Even at clinical death,
the brain lives for another 8-10 minutes (ask any EMT).
- State of Fugue -- somnambulant, zombie-like state. Seen
occasionally.
- Cognitive Dissonance -- or confusion, is more common. Common
manifestations include remembering things out of sequence, trivial things
looming large in the mind immediately after the incident, and important
things being lost to short-term memory immediately after the incident. For
example, after a shooting, a thing that really sticks in your mind is that
you ripped a hole in your clothes in drawing your pistol. You mention this
to the police ("damn, I tore my slacks" [and somebody else is laying there
dead]). Certain sub-humans with dorsal fins under their pinstripes might
bring such a thing up in court as a "proof" of your cold-heartedness (Ayoob
recounts a case where it did). In reality what you've manifested is a type
of denial response, a proof of innocence in its own right. Cognitive
dissonance can be one of the mind's ways of saying "no, I didn't just come
within 5 seconds of being dead, that didn't happen to me." EMTs see this
when they witness colleagues telling jokes and laughing at the site of a
gruesome traffic accident. They're not hard-hearted; they are crushed by
what they've had to look at.
The net effect of all this is that one is well-advised not to recount
things in detail to LEOs immediately after a violent encounter. The
perceptions of the victim (you) may well be warped, and passing them along
to police will ill-serve the cause of justice. It sometimes takes time to
sort things out. How many shots did you fire? I don't know; I didn't count.
How close was the assailant? Close enough to kill me. What did you say to
him? Words to the effect of ... something along the lines of ... How long
did it take? I don't know; I didn't check my watch. Give yourself some time
to sort things out before you recount them in detail to police. One does
this not to "beat the rap," but to help make sure that justice is done.
When you do tell it to the police in detail, let it be what really
happened, not just how it seemed to you in the first moments after you
survived a deadly encounter.
At the end of the video, Ayoob turns to a subject not specifically related
to the physio-psychological aspects of violent encounters, but certainly
related to "surviving the aftermath," and that is preconditional bias and
prejudice. He points out that, if one in the habit of using terms such as
nigger, wop, spic, etc., and if -- to defend innocent life -- one has to
kill a African-American, Italian, or Hispanic, such verbal habits will come
back to haunt you in the courtroom. Scatological language is less of a
problem, but is still not a good idea. In your self-defense case, you want
to be able to present yourself as the innocent victim, not as a
foul-mouthed roughneck who enraged the deceased by verbal abuse. Ayoob
advises his students to lose such verbal habits, and to learn verbal crisis
de-escalation instead. Being able to demonstrate that one attempted to
verbally de-escalate a situation goes a long way towards defeating the
other side's allegations of malice.
Summarized by Patrick Casey (pcasey@interart.com)